All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations

DSpace/Manakin Repository

All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations
Author: Hyde, Daniel Charles; Spelke, Elizabeth S.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Hyde, Daniel Charles, and Elizabeth S. Spelke. 2009. All numbers are not equal: An electrophysiological investigation of small and large number representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(6): 1039-1053.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Behavioral and brain imaging research indicates that human infants, humans adults, and many nonhuman animals represent large nonsymbolic numbers approximately, discriminating between sets with a ratio limit on accuracy. Some behavioral evidence, especially with human infants, suggests that these representations differ from representations of small numbers of objects. To investigate neural signatures of this distinction, event-related potentials were recorded as adult humans passively viewed the sequential presentation of dot arrays in an adaptation paradigm. In two studies, subjects viewed successive arrays of a single number of dots interspersed with test arrays presenting the same or a different number; numerical range (small numerical quantities 1–3 vs. large numerical quantities 8–24) and ratio difference varied across blocks as continuous variables were controlled. An early-evoked component (N1), observed over widespread posterior scalp locations, was modulated by absolute number with small, but not large, number arrays. In contrast, a later component (P2p), observed over the same scalp locations, was modulated by the ratio difference between arrays for large, but not small, numbers. Despite many years of experience with symbolic systems that apply equally to all numbers, adults spontaneously process small and large numbers differently. They appear to treat small-number arrays as individual objects to be tracked through space and time, and large-number arrays as cardinal values to be compared and manipulated.
Published Version: doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21090
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10269045
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters