Examining Methods Used to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Childhood Obesity Interventions
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationWright, Davene. 2012. Examining Methods Used to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Childhood Obesity Interventions. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
AbstractThis dissertation examines methods used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of childhood obesity interventions in order to help decision-makers prioritize among competing health programs using standardized outcomes. Chapter 1 generates inputs for use in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of childhood obesity interventions. In Chapter 1.1, I use data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to predict expenditures associated with obesity in childhood and adolescence. I found that obese children and adolescents have significantly different expenditures than their normal weight counterparts. I conclude that exclusion of obesity-related medical expenditures can potentially undervalue the cost-effectiveness of interventions. In Chapter 1.2, I use data from the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development to examine the longitudinal trajectory of child weight. I derived probabilities of transitioning between weight classes that can be used in a decision-analytic model to extrapolate the effectiveness of childhood obesity interventions beyond childhood. I found that deviating from CDC BMI reference categories can more accurately capture the risk of future obesity. In Chapter 2, I evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a primary care-based obesity prevention program, High Five for Kids. Over two years, High Five for Kids was low-cost, but only marginally effective in reducing BMI. I used a decision analytic simulation model to extrapolate trial outcomes over a 10-year horizon, and found that in the long-term, primary care based obesity prevention was likely to be cost-effective relative to usual care. I also found that key methodological considerations can meaningfully influence the cost-effectiveness of childhood obesity interventions. In Chapter 3, I develop an agent-based model to explore the dynamics of the potential spread of obesity within families. I found that the “contagion” of obesity could result in significant collateral weight loss in family members not targeted in an intervention. As a result, CEAs may underestimate the benefits of obesity interventions. Moreover, I found that unless interventions are targeted toward all obese children in a family, the contagion of obesity can hinder weight loss in intervention targets. This model can be leveraged as a tool to optimize family-based obesity intervention strategies and inform randomized controlled obesity prevention trials.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10288417
- FAS Theses and Dissertations