Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuang, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorBelliveau, John William
dc.contributor.authorTengshe, Chinmayi
dc.contributor.authorAhveninen, Jyrki Pekka
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-27T19:26:10Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationHuang, Samantha, John William Belliveau, Chinmayi Tengshe, and Jyrki Pekka Ahveninen. 2012. Brain networks of novelty-driven involuntary and cued voluntary auditory attention shifting. PLoS ONE 7(8): e44062.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10349652
dc.description.abstractIn everyday life, we need a capacity to flexibly shift attention between alternative sound sources. However, relatively little work has been done to elucidate the mechanisms of attention shifting in the auditory domain. Here, we used a mixed event-related/sparse-sampling fMRI approach to investigate this essential cognitive function. In each 10-sec trial, subjects were instructed to wait for an auditory “cue” signaling the location where a subsequent “target” sound was likely to be presented. The target was occasionally replaced by an unexpected “novel” sound in the uncued ear, to trigger involuntary attention shifting. To maximize the attention effects, cues, targets, and novels were embedded within dichotic 800-Hz vs. 1500-Hz pure-tone “standard” trains. The sound of clustered fMRI acquisition (starting at t = 7.82 sec) served as a controlled trial-end signal. Our approach revealed notable activation differences between the conditions. Cued voluntary attention shifting activated the superior intra­­parietal sulcus (IPS), whereas novelty-triggered involuntary orienting activated the inferior IPS and certain subareas of the precuneus. Clearly more widespread activations were observed during voluntary than involuntary orienting in the premotor cortex, including the frontal eye fields. Moreover, we found ­evidence for a frontoinsular-cingular attentional control network, consisting of the anterior insula, inferior frontal cortex, and medial frontal cortices, which were activated during both target discrimination and voluntary attention shifting. Finally, novels and targets activated much wider areas of superior temporal auditory cortices than shifting cues.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044062en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429427en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectBiologyen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Neuroscienceen_US
dc.subjectCognitionen_US
dc.subjectNeuroimagingen_US
dc.subjectSensory Systemsen_US
dc.subjectAuditory Systemen_US
dc.subjectNeuroanatomyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectAnatomy and Physiologyen_US
dc.subjectNeurological Systemen_US
dc.subjectNeurologyen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Neurologyen_US
dc.subjectfMRIen_US
dc.titleBrain Networks of Novelty-Driven Involuntary and Cued Voluntary Auditory Attention Shiftingen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONEen_US
dash.depositing.authorHuang, Samantha
dc.date.available2013-02-27T19:26:10Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0044062*
dash.contributor.affiliatedBelliveau, John William
dash.contributor.affiliatedAhveninen, Jyrki
dash.contributor.affiliatedHuang, Samantha


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record