Non-Linear Mixed Models in the Analysis of Mediated Longitudinal Data with Binary Outcomes

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Non-Linear Mixed Models in the Analysis of Mediated Longitudinal Data with Binary Outcomes

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Non-Linear Mixed Models in the Analysis of Mediated Longitudinal Data with Binary Outcomes
Author: Cheng, Debbie M; Blood, Emily Alice

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Blood, Emily A., and Debbie M. Cheng. 2012. Non-linear mixed models in the analysis of mediated longitudinal data with binary outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology 12:5.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Structural equation models (SEMs) provide a general framework for analyzing mediated longitudinal data. However when interest is in the total effect (i.e. direct plus indirect) of a predictor on the binary outcome, alternative statistical techniques such as non-linear mixed models (NLMM) may be preferable, particularly if specific causal pathways are not hypothesized or specialized SEM software is not readily available. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the performance of the NLMM in a setting where the SEM is presumed optimal. Methods: We performed a simulation study to assess the performance of NLMMs relative to SEMs with respect to bias, coverage probability, and power in the analysis of mediated binary longitudinal outcomes. Both logistic and probit models were evaluated. Models were also applied to data from a longitudinal study assessing the impact of alcohol consumption on HIV disease progression. Results: For the logistic model, the NLMM adequately estimated the total effect of a repeated predictor on the repeated binary outcome and were similar to the SEM across a variety of scenarios evaluating sample size, effect size, and distributions of direct vs. indirect effects. For the probit model, the NLMM adequately estimated the total effect of the repeated predictor, however, the probit SEM overestimated effects. Conclusions: Both logistic and probit NLMMs performed well relative to corresponding SEMs with respect to bias, coverage probability and power. In addition, in the probit setting, the NLMM may produce better estimates of the total effect than the probit SEM, which appeared to overestimate effects.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-5
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3353200/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10384787
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters