Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton

Citable link to this page


Title: Vascular Disrupting Agent Drug Classes Differ in Effects on the Cytoskeleton
Author: Kim, Sujeong; Peshkin, Lenoid; Mitchison, Timothy J.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Kim, Sujeong, Leonid Peshkin, and Timothy J. Mitchison. 2012. Vascular disrupting agent drug classes differ in effects on the cytoskeleton. PLoS ONE 7(7): 40177.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs), anti-cancer drugs that target established tumor blood vessels, fall into two main classes: microtubule targeting drugs, exemplified by combretastatin A4 (CA4), and flavonoids, exemplified by 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA). Both classes increase permeability of tumor vasculature in mouse models, and DMXAA in particular can cause massive tumor necrosis. The molecular target of CA4 is clearly microtubules. The molecular target(s) of DMXAA remains unclear. It is thought to promote inflammatory signaling in leukocytes, and has been assumed to not target microtubules, though it is not clear from the literature how carefully this assumption has been tested. An earlier flavone analog, flavone acetic acid, was reported to promote mitotic arrest suggesting flavones might possess anti-microtubule activity, and endothelial cells are sensitive to even mild disruption of microtubules. We carefully investigated whether DMXAA directly affects the microtubule or actin cytoskeletons of endothelial cells by comparing effects of CA4 and DMXAA on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) using time-lapse imaging and assays for cytoskeleton integrity. CA4 caused retraction of the cell margin, mitotic arrest and microtubule depolymerization, while DMXAA, up to 500 µM, showed none of these effects. DMXAA also had no effect on pure tubulin nucleation and polymerization, unlike CA4. We conclude that DMXAA exhibits no direct anti-microtubule action and thus cleanly differs from CA4 in its mechanism of action at the molecular level.
Published Version: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040177
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search