Understanding Immersivity: Image Generation and Transformation Processes in 3D Immersive Environments

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Understanding Immersivity: Image Generation and Transformation Processes in 3D Immersive Environments

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Understanding Immersivity: Image Generation and Transformation Processes in 3D Immersive Environments
Author: Kozhevnikov, Maria; Dhond, Rupali P.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Kozhevnikov, Maria, and Rupali P. Dhond. 2012. Understanding immersivity: image generation and transformation processes in 3D immersive environments. Frontiers in Psychology 3:285.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Most research on three-dimensional (3D) visual-spatial processing has been conducted using traditional non-immersive 2D displays. Here we investigated how individuals generate and transform mental images within 3D immersive (3DI) virtual environments, in which the viewers perceive themselves as being surrounded by a 3D world. In Experiment 1, we compared participants’ performance on the Shepard and Metzler (1971) mental rotation (MR) task across the following three types of visual presentation environments; traditional 2D non-immersive (2DNI), 3D non-immersive (3DNI – anaglyphic glasses), and 3DI (head mounted display with position and head orientation tracking). In Experiment 2, we examined how the use of different backgrounds affected MR processes within the 3DI environment. In Experiment 3, we compared electroencephalogram data recorded while participants were mentally rotating visual-spatial images presented in 3DI vs. 2DNI environments. Overall, the findings of the three experiments suggest that visual-spatial processing is different in immersive and non-immersive environments, and that immersive environments may require different image encoding and transformation strategies than the two other non-immersive environments. Specifically, in a non-immersive environment, participants may utilize a scene-based frame of reference and allocentric encoding whereas immersive environments may encourage the use of a viewer-centered frame of reference and egocentric encoding. These findings also suggest that MR performed in laboratory conditions using a traditional 2D computer screen may not reflect spatial processing as it would occur in the real world.
Published Version: doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00284
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415688/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10471499
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters