Statistics of Neuronal Identification with Open- and Closed-Loop Measures of Intrinsic Excitability

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Statistics of Neuronal Identification with Open- and Closed-Loop Measures of Intrinsic Excitability

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Statistics of Neuronal Identification with Open- and Closed-Loop Measures of Intrinsic Excitability
Author: Brookings, Ted; Marder, Eve; Grashow, Rachel

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Brookings, Ted, Rachel Grashow, and Eve Marder. 2012. Statistics of neuronal identification with open- and closed-loop measures of intrinsic excitability. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 6:19.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: In complex nervous systems patterns of neuronal activity and measures of intrinsic neuronal excitability are often used as criteria for identifying and/or classifying neurons. We asked how well identification of neurons by conventional measures of intrinsic excitability compares with a measure of neuronal excitability derived from a neuron’s behavior in a dynamic clamp constructed two-cell network. We used four cell types from the crab stomatogastric ganglion: the pyloric dilator, lateral pyloric, gastric mill, and dorsal gastric neurons. Each neuron was evaluated for six conventional measures of intrinsic excitability (intrinsic properties, IPs). Additionally, each neuron was coupled by reciprocal inhibitory synapses made with the dynamic clamp to a Morris–Lecar model neuron and the resulting network was assayed for four measures of network activity (network activity properties, NAPs). We searched for linear combinations of IPs that correlated with each NAP, and combinations of NAPs that correlated with each IP. In the process we developed a method to correct for multiple correlations while searching for correlating features. When properly controlled for multiple correlations, four of the IPs were correlated with NAPs, and all four NAPs were correlated with IPs. Neurons were classified into cell types by training a linear classifier on sets of properties, or using k-medoids clustering. The IPs were modestly successful in classifying the neurons, and the NAPs were more successful. Combining the two measures did better than either measure alone, but not well enough to classify neurons with perfect accuracy, thus reiterating that electrophysiological measures of single-cell properties alone are not sufficient for reliable cell identification.
Published Version: doi:10.3389/fncir.2012.00019
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338007/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10483973
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters