Surgeons' Volume-Outcome Relationship for Lobectomies and Wedge Resections for Cancer Using Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Techniques

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Surgeons' Volume-Outcome Relationship for Lobectomies and Wedge Resections for Cancer Using Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Techniques

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Surgeons' Volume-Outcome Relationship for Lobectomies and Wedge Resections for Cancer Using Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Techniques
Author: David, Guy; Gunnarsson, Candace L.; Moore, Matt; Howington, John; Maddaus, Michael A.; Meyers, Bryan F.; Miller, Daniel L.; McKenna, Robert; Swanson, Scott James

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: David, Guy, Candace L. Gunnarsson, Matt Moore, John Howington, Daniel L. Miller, Michael A. Maddaus, Robert McKenna, Bryan F. Meyers, and Scott James Swanson. 2012. Surgeons' volume-outcome relationship for lobectomies and wedge resections for cancer using video-assisted thoracoscopic techniques. Minimally Invasive Surgery 2012:760292.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: This study examined the effect of surgeons' volume on outcomes in lung surgery: lobectomies and wedge resections. Additionally, the effect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) on cost, utilization, and adverse events was analyzed. The Premier Hospital Database was the data source for this analysis. Eligible patients were those of any age undergoing lobectomy or wedge resection using VATS for cancer treatment. Volume was represented by the aggregate experience level of the surgeon in a six-month window before each surgery. A positive volume-outcome relationship was found with some notable features. The relationship is stronger for cost and utilization outcomes than for adverse events; for thoracic surgeons as opposed to other surgeons; for VATS lobectomies rather than VATS wedge resections. While there was a reduction in cost and resource utilization with greater experience in VATS, these outcomes were not associated with greater experience in open procedures.
Published Version: doi:10.1155/2012/760292
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3504426/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10609728
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters