Abolishing Judicial Review

 
View/Open
70100189.pdf (568.7Kb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Author
Published Version
http://web.ebscohost.com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/ehost/detail?sid=534dbf19-563d-4640-b6b4-a9ed9144d98c%40sessionmgr111&vid=5&hid=114&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=aph&AN=70100189
Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Mark Tushnet, Abolishing Judicial Review, 27 Const. Comment. 581 (2011).
Abstract
An Essay is presented on the judicial review of the proposed amendments of the U.S. Constitution and acts of the U.S. Congress. It further discusses the role of judges as experts in law which include addressing all constitutional complaints, interpretation of government policies. It also states that the proposed amendments can provide the Congress rights to enact statutes and discusses the need of developing institutional mechanism to improve capacity of the law experts.
Citable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10880566

Collections

Comments made during the workflow steps
Ungraded journal.