Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTushnet, Mark V.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-22T16:05:21Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationMark Tushnet, Abolishing Judicial Review, 27 Const. Comment. 581 (2011).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0742-7115en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10880566
dc.description.abstractAn Essay is presented on the judicial review of the proposed amendments of the U.S. Constitution and acts of the U.S. Congress. It further discusses the role of judges as experts in law which include addressing all constitutional complaints, interpretation of government policies. It also states that the proposed amendments can provide the Congress rights to enact statutes and discusses the need of developing institutional mechanism to improve capacity of the law experts.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://web.ebscohost.com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/ehost/detail?sid=534dbf19-563d-4640-b6b4-a9ed9144d98c%40sessionmgr111&vid=5&hid=114&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=aph&AN=70100189en_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleAbolishing Judicial Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalConstitutional Commentaryen_US
dash.depositing.authorTushnet, Mark V.
dash.embargo.until10000-01-01
workflow.legacycommentsUngraded journal.en_US
dash.contributor.affiliatedTushnet, Mark


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record