The Exclusionary Rule Redux--Again

DSpace/Manakin Repository

The Exclusionary Rule Redux--Again

Citable link to this page


Title: The Exclusionary Rule Redux--Again
Author: Weinreb, Lloyd Lobell
Citation: Lloyd L. Weinreb, The Exclusionary Rule Redux--Again, 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 837 (2010).
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The exclusionary rule itself is not very complicated: if the police obtain evidence by means that violate a person’s rights under the Fourth Amendment, the evidence is not admissible against that person in a criminal trial. The basic provision, however, has been freighted with innumerable epicycles, and epicycles on epicycles ever since it was made part of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. The exclusionary rule survives in a kind of doctrinal purgatory, neither accepted fully into the constitutional canon nor cast into the outer darkness. It survives, but its reach is uncertain, its rational questioned, and its value doubted. Hudson v. Michigan and Herring v. United States again pose the question what the rule’s future is, or rather, whether it has a future.
Published Version:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search