Characteristics of two different locking compression plates in the volar fixation of complex articular distal radius fractures

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Characteristics of two different locking compression plates in the volar fixation of complex articular distal radius fractures

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Characteristics of two different locking compression plates in the volar fixation of complex articular distal radius fractures
Author: von Recum, J.; Matschke, S.; Jupiter, Jesse Bernard; Ring, David; Souer, J-S.; Huber, M.; Audigé, L.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: von Recum, J., S. Matschke, J. B. Jupiter, D. Ring, J-S. Souer, M. Huber, and L. Audigé. 2012. Characteristics of two different locking compression plates in the volar fixation of complex articular distal radius fractures. Bone & Joint Research 1(6): 111-117.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the differences of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of complex AO Type C distal radius fractures between two different models of a single implant type. Methods: A total of 136 patients who received either a 2.4 mm (n = 61) or 3.5 mm (n = 75) distal radius locking compression plate (LCP DR) using a volar approach were followed over two years. The main outcome measurements included motion, grip strength, pain, and the scores of Gartland and Werley, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). Differences between the treatment groups were evaluated using regression analysis and the likelihood ratio test with significance based on the Bonferroni corrected p-value of < 0.003. Results: The groups were similar with respect to baseline and injury characteristics as well as general surgical details. The risk of experiencing a complication after ORIF with a LCP DR 2.4 mm was 18% (n = 11) compared with 11% (n = 8) after receiving a LCP DR 3.5 mm (p = 0.45). Wrist function was also similar between the cohorts based on the mean ranges of movement (all p > 0.052) and grip strength measurements relative to the contralateral healthy side (p = 0.583). In addition, DASH and SF-36 component scores as well as pain were not significantly different between the treatment groups throughout the two-year period (all p ≥ 0.005). No patient from either treatment group had a step-off > 2 mm. Conclusions: Differences in plate design do not influence the overall final outcome of fracture fixation using LCP.
Published Version: doi:10.1302/2046-3758.16.2000008
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626195/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11180373
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters