Comparing Customary Rules of Fairness: Evaluative Practices in Various Types of Peer Review Panels

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Comparing Customary Rules of Fairness: Evaluative Practices in Various Types of Peer Review Panels

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Comparing Customary Rules of Fairness: Evaluative Practices in Various Types of Peer Review Panels
Author: Lamont, Michele; Huutoniemi, Katri

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Lamont, Michèle, and Katri Huutoniemi. 2011. Comparing customary rules of fairness: Evaluative practices in various types of peer review panels. In Social Knowledge in the Making, ed. Charles Camic, Neil Gross, and Michèle Lamont, 209-232. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Full Text & Related Files:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11320622
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters