The 'Antidirector Rights Index' Revisited
Rev. Financ. Stud.-2009-Spamann-rfs_hhp067.pdf (128.6Kb)
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationHolger Spamann, The 'Antidirector Rights Index' Revisited, 23 Rev. Fin. Stud. 467 (2010).
AbstractThe “antidirector rights index” has been used as a measure of shareholder protection in over a hundred articles since it was introduced by La Porta et al. (“Law and Finance.” 1998, Journal of Political Economy 106:1113–55). A thorough reexamination of the legal data, however, leads to corrections for thirty-three of the forty-six countries analyzed. The correlation between corrected and original values is only 0.53. Consequently, many empirical results established using the original index may not be replicable with corrected values. In particular, the corrected index fails to support three widely influential claims: that shareholder protection is higher in common than in civil law countries; that shareholder protection predicts stock market size or ownership dispersion; and that weak corporate governance explains the extent of exchange rate depreciation during the Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11339401
- HLS Scholarly Articles