Legal Origin or Colonial History?
Journal of Legal Analysis-2011-Klerman-379-409.pdf (232.0Kb)
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.
Mahoney, Paul G.
Weinstein, Mark I.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationDaniel M. Klerman, Paul G. Mahoney, Holger Spamann & Mark I. Weinstein, Legal Origin or Colonial History?, 3 J. Legal Analysis 379 (2011).
AbstractEconomists have documented pervasive correlations between legal origins, modern regulation, and economic outcomes around the world. Where legal origin is exogenous, however, it is almost perfectly correlated with another set of potentially relevant background variables: the colonial policies of the European powers that spread the “origin” legal systems through the world. We attempt to disentangle these factors by exploiting the imperfect overlap of colonizer and legal origin, and looking at possible channels, such as the structure of the legal system, through which these factors might influence contemporary economic outcomes. We find strong evidence in favor of on-legal colonial explanations for economic growth. For other dependent variables, the results are mixed.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11339402
- HLS Scholarly Articles 
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)