Design Copyright: The Latest Judicial Hint

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Design Copyright: The Latest Judicial Hint

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Design Copyright: The Latest Judicial Hint
Author: Hemphill, C. Scott; Suk, Jeannie Chi Young

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: C. Scott Hemphill & Jeannie C. Suk, Design Copyright: The Latest Judicial Hint, Competition Pol'y Int'l (May 28, 2013), available at https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/design-copyright-the-latest-judicial-hint/.
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Earlier this year, in an important copyright ruling, the Supreme Court dropped a puzzling clue about copyright for designs that merits examination. In an opinion authored by Justice Breyer, the Court's foremost copyright scholar, the Court posited a "design copyright" for a "dress" made in China and then sold in the United States. The statement is striking because courts have traditionally denied the copyrightability of fashion designs, including dress designs. A proposed bill to add fashion designs to copyrightable subject matter has not yet been passed by Congress. In this article, we explain the Court's unexpected comment and why it matters.

The decision, Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, addresses the "first sale" doctrine, which permits an owner of an authorized copy to "sell or otherwise dispose of" that copy without seeking permission of the copyright holder. This common-sense limitation on the copyright holder's right to distribute his work embodies a principle of exhaustion, promoting the free alienability of goods and reducing transaction costs.

The question in Kirtsaeng was whether this doctrine applies not only to copies made in the United States, but also to copies made abroad and imported into the United States. The question was in doubt because a separate provision of the Copyright Act prohibits importation without permission. An earlier case held that the first sale doctrine trumped if the work had done a "round trip"-produced in the United States, exported overseas, and then returned to the United States for resale. Kirtsaeng accorded the same treatment to the closely related situation in which the copy was instead produced overseas and sold in the United States.
Published Version: https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/file/view/6931
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11339434
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters