On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts

DSpace/Manakin Repository

On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts

Citable link to this page


Title: On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts
Author: Shavell, Steven
Citation: Steven M. Shavell, On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts, 22 J.L. Econ. & Org. 289 (2006).
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The major theme of this article is that the interpretation of contracts is in the interests of contracting parties. The general reasons are (a) that interpretation may improve on otherwise imperfect contracts; and (b) that the prospect of interpretation allows parties to write simpler contracts and thus to conserve on contracting effort. A method of interpretation is defined as a function whose argument is the written contract and whose value is another contract, the interpreted contract, which is what actually governs the parties' joint enterprise. It is shown that interpretation is superior to enforcement of contracts as written, and the optimal method of interpretation is analyzed.
Published Version: http://jleo.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/2/289.full.pdf
Other Sources: http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/shavell/pdf/06-Shavell-InterpCont-JLEO.pdf
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11352689
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search