Oracle v. PeopleSoft: A Case Study

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Oracle v. PeopleSoft: A Case Study

Citable link to this page


Title: Oracle v. PeopleSoft: A Case Study
Author: Millstone, David; Subramanian, Guhan

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: David Millstone & Guhan Subramanian, Oracle v. PeopleSoft: A Case Study, 12 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2007).
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: This case describes Oracle's hostile takeover bid to acquire PeopleSoft, which began with an unsolicited cash tender offer at $16.00 per share in June 2003 and ended with a negotiated deal at $26.50 per share in December 2004. Novel questions of corporate law are raised by the prolonged use of a poison pill against a structurally non-coercive, all-cash, fully-financed offer; as well as PeopleSoft's unprecedented Customer Assurance Program (CAP), which promised PeopleSoft customers between two and five times their money back if Oracle acquired PeopleSoft and then reduced support for PeopleSoft products. This case study will be published as part of a dealmaking symposium in the Harvard Negotiation Law Review, followed by commentaries from practitioners involved in the deal, judges, and academics.
Published Version:
Other Sources:
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search