On Avoiding Foundational Questions

DSpace/Manakin Repository

On Avoiding Foundational Questions

Citable link to this page


Title: On Avoiding Foundational Questions
Author: Sunstein, Cass Robert
Citation: Cass R. Sunstein, On Avoiding Foundational Questions, 60 Stan. L. Rev. 241 (2007).
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: In both legal practice and legal scholarship, it is sometimes best to proceed without attempting to answer the foundational questions. Originalists can inquire into the original public meaning of the Equal Protection Clause without defending originalism. Economic analysts of law can ask how to promote efficiency without defending the view that the law should aim at efficiency. It would be useful to know how utilitarians and retributivists would approach punitive damage awards, without resolving the question whether we should be utilitarians or retributivists. Here, as elsewhere, a division of labor makes good sense. Some people (or some works) take certain judgments for granted and proceed from there; other people (or other works) try to resolve the deepest questions.
Published Version: http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/sites/default/files/articles/SunsteinReply.pdf
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11354038
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search