Backlash's Travel

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Backlash's Travel

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Backlash's Travel
Author: Sunstein, Cass Robert
Citation: Cass R. Sunstein, Backlash's Travels, 42 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 435 (2007).
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Sometimes the public greatly opposes the decisions of the Supreme Court; sometimes the Court seems to anticipate public backlash and even to respond to it when it occurs. Should a social planner want the Court to anticipate or to respond to backlash? No abstract answer is possible; the appropriate conclusion depends on assumptions about the capacities of courts and the capacities of those who engage in backlash. This point is demonstrated through an exploration of four imaginable worlds: Olympus, the Land of the Ancients, Lochnerland, and Athens. The four worlds reflect radically different assumptions about judicial and public capacities. The proper analysis of backlash depends, in large part, on the prevailing theory of constitutional interpretation, and on whether judges have privileged access to constitutional meaning. If judges lack such access, backlash is a healthy part of dialogue between judges and the public, and the judiciary should sometimes yield. If our world is Olympus, the argument for attention to backlash is severely weakened.
Published Version: http://web.archive.org/web/20100215023412/http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/crcl/vol42_2/CRCL422.pdf
Other Sources: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=970685
http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=public_law_and_legal_theory
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11354039
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters