Safety and Availability of Clofazimine in the Treatment of Multidrug and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Analysis of Published Guidance and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

View/ Open
Author
Dotsenko, Svetlana
Jafarov, Azizkhon
Weyer, Karin
Falzon, Dennis
Lunte, Kaspars
Nunn, Paul
Jaramillo, Ernesto
Wares, Douglas F.
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004143Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hwang, Thomas J., Svetlana Dotsenko, Azizkhon Jafarov, Karin Weyer, Dennis Falzon, Kaspars Lunte, Paul Nunn, Ernesto Jaramillo, Salmaan A. Keshavjee, and Douglas F. Wares. 2014. Safety and availability of clofazimine in the treatment of multidrug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: Analysis of published guidance and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ Open 4(1): e004143.Abstract
Objectives: Given the spread of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), new therapies are urgently needed, including the repurposing of existing drugs. We aimed to assess key considerations for the clinical and programmatic use of clofazimine (Cfz), a riminophenazine with anti-mycobacterial activity currently used to treat leprosy. Design: Fixed and random effects meta-analysis of cohort studies and systematic review Setting: Electronic and manual searches were combined. Inclusion criteria: Observational studies on treatment of multidrug- and extremely drug- resistant tuberculosis with clofazimine or a clofazimine-containing regimen, and published guidance and documents relating to cost and availability were eligible. Results: Five observational studies enrolled 861 patients, of which 602 received Cfz. The pooled proportion of adverse drug reactions requiring discontinuation of Cfz treatment was 0.1% (95% CI: [0.0, 0.6%]), and the median frequency of all adverse events was 5.1%. Cfz showed in vitro efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Cfz-containing regimens may have had a useful role in the treatment of patients with drug-resistant strains and who had limited alternative treatment options. However, Cfz uptake remains insufficient to meet global needs; there is only one internationally quality-assured manufacturer, which produces a limited quantity of the drug prioritised for treatment of leprosy, the only indication for which the drug is registered. Conclusions: While the data were limited, Cfz was associated with a risk for adverse drug reactions comparable to that of first-line TB treatment, which could be reasonably managed under programmatic conditions. However, low market availability and high cost are important barriers to access to Cfz for MDR-TB patients.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11370657
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [17813]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)