Strategic Disclosure: The Case of Business School Rankings

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Strategic Disclosure: The Case of Business School Rankings

Citable link to this page


Title: Strategic Disclosure: The Case of Business School Rankings
Author: Luca, Michael; Smith, Jonathan

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Luca, Michael, and Jonathan Smith. "Strategic Disclosure: The Case of Business School Rankings." Working Paper. (Published in the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, April 2015.)
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: We empirically analyze disclosure decisions made by 240 MBA programs about which rankings to display on their websites. We present three main findings. First, consistent with theories of countersignaling, top schools are least likely to disclose their rankings, whereas mid-ranked schools are most likely to disclose. Second, schools that do poorly in the U.S. News rankings are more likely to disclose their Princeton Review certification, suggesting that schools treat different certifications as substitutes. Third, conditional on displaying a ranking, the majority of schools coarsen information to make it seem more favorable. The stark patterns in the data help to provide empirical evidence on the strategic elements of voluntary disclosure and marketing decisions.
Published Version:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search