Trends in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator racial disparity

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Trends in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator racial disparity

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Trends in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator racial disparity
Author: Groeneveld, Peter W.; Heidenreich, Paul A.; Garber, Alan M

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Groeneveld, Peter W., Paul A. Heidenreich, and Alan M. Garber. 2005. Trends in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator racial disparity. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 45, 1:72-78.
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objectives
The study was designed to determine whether racial disparity in utilization of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has improved over time, and whether small-area geographic variation in ICD utilization contributed to national levels of racial disparity.

Background
Although racial disparities in cardiac procedures have been well-documented, it is unknown whether there has been improvement over time. Low ICD utilization rates in predominantly black geographic areas may have exacerbated national levels of disparity.

Methods
Discharge abstracts from elderly black and white Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with ventricular arrhythmias from 1990 to 2000 were analyzed to determine if ICD implantation occurred within 90 days of initial hospitalization. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to assess the relationship between ICD implantation, year of admission, and the percentage of black inhabitants in each patient's county of hospitalization while controlling for clinical, hospital, and demographic characteristics.

Results
There was improvement in ICD implantation racial disparity: In the period 1990 to 1992, black patients had an odds ratio of 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 to 0.64) for receiving an ICD compared with whites. However, by 1999 to 2000, the odds ratio for blacks had risen to 0.69 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.78) (test-for-trend p = 0.01). Approximately 20% of this trend could be explained by reduction in geographic variation in ICD use between areas with larger black and predominantly white populations.

Conclusions
Rates of ICD implants became more equal among whites and blacks during the 1990s, although persistent disparity remained at the decade's end. Geographic equalization in cardiovascular procedure rates may be an essential mechanism in rectifying disparities in health care.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.061
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11595745
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters