Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRosenthal, Robert
dc.contributor.authorLi, Heng
dc.contributor.authorRubin, Donald B.
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-19T16:41:59Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifierQuick submit: 2014-01-29T11:57:31-05:00
dc.identifier.citationRosenthal, Robert, Heng Li and Donald B. Rubin. 1996. "Reliability of Measurement in Psychology: From Spearman-Brown to Maximal Reliability." Psychological Methods 1, No. 1: 98-107.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1082-989Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11718202
dc.description.abstractThe authors extend the usual approach to the assessment of test or rater reliability to situations that have previously not been appropriate for the application of this standard (Spearman-Brown) approach. Specifically, the authors (a) provide an accurate overall estimate of the reliability of a test (or a panel of raters) comprising 2 or more different kinds of items (or raters), a quite common situation, and (b) provide a simple procedure for constructing the overall instrument when it comprises 2 or more kinds of items, judges, or raters, each with its own costs and its own reliabilities.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPsychologyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipStatisticsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleReliability of Measurement in Psychology: From Spearman-Brown to Maximal Reliabilityen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.date.updated2014-01-29T16:58:59Z
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.rights.holderRosenthal, Robert
dc.relation.journalPsychological Methodsen_US
dash.depositing.authorRosenthal, Robert
dash.embargo.until10000-01-01
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.98
dash.contributor.affiliatedRosenthal, Robert
dash.contributor.affiliatedLi, Heng
dash.contributor.affiliatedRubin, Donald


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record