"SOME THINGS YOU LEARN AREN'T SO": Cohen's Paradox, Asch's Paradigm, and the Interpretation of Interaction
View/ Open
QUANT,PS95,Interaction[2].pdf (1.503Mb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00297.xMetadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ralph L. Rosnow and Robert Rosenthal. 1995. "'SOME THINGS YOU LEARN AREN'T SO': Cohen's Paradox, Asch's Paradigm, and the Interpretation of Interaction." Psychological Science 6, No. 1: 3-9.Abstract
When interpreting an interaction In the analysts of variance (ANOVA), many active researchers (and, In turn, students) often Ignore the residuals defining the interaction Although this problem has been noted previously, It appears that many users ofANOVA remain uncertain about the proper understanding of interaction effects To clear up this problem, we revIew the way In which. the ANOVA model enables us to take apart a table of group means or the individual measurements contributing to the means to reveal the underlying components We also show how (using only published data) to compute a contrast on the question that may be of primary Interest and Illustrate strategies for interpreting tables of residuals We conclude with an exercise to check on students' understanding ofANOVA and to encourage Increased preCISIOn In the specification of research results.Citable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11718226
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [17574]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)
Comments made during the workflow steps
FLAG2 Cannot archive publisher's version.