Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDams, Judith
dc.contributor.authorKlotsche, Jens
dc.contributor.authorBornschein, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorReese, Jens P
dc.contributor.authorBalzer-Geldsetzer, Monika
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Yaroslav
dc.contributor.authorSchrag, Anette
dc.contributor.authorSiderowf, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorOertel, Wolfgang H
dc.contributor.authorDeuschl, Günther
dc.contributor.authorSiebert, Uwe
dc.contributor.authorDodel, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-21T20:31:20Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationDams, Judith, Jens Klotsche, Bernhard Bornschein, Jens P Reese, Monika Balzer-Geldsetzer, Yaroslav Winter, Anette Schrag, et al. 2013. Mapping the eq-5d index by updrs and pdq-8 in patients with parkinson’s disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 11: 35.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11732111
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical studies employ the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to measure the severity of Parkinson’s disease. Evaluations often fail to consider the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) or apply disease-specific instruments. Health-economic studies normally use estimates of utilities to calculate quality-adjusted life years. We aimed to develop an estimation algorithm for EuroQol- 5 dimensions (EQ-5D)-based utilities from the clinical UPDRS or disease-specific HrQoL data in the absence of original utilities estimates. Methods: Linear and fractional polynomial regression analyses were performed with data from a study of Parkinson’s disease patients (n=138) to predict the EQ-5D index values from UPDRS and Parkinson’s disease questionnaire eight dimensions (PDQ-8) data. German and European weights were used to calculate the EQ-5D index. The models were compared by R2, the root mean square error (RMS), the Bayesian information criterion, and Pregibon’s link test. Three independent data sets validated the models. Results: The regression analyses resulted in a single best prediction model (R2: 0.713 and 0.684, RMS: 0.139 and 13.78 for indices with German and European weights, respectively) consisting of UPDRS subscores II, III, IVa-c as predictors. When the PDQ-8 items were utilised as independent variables, the model resulted in an R2 of 0.60 and 0.67. The independent data confirmed the prediction models. Conclusion: The best results were obtained from a model consisting of UPDRS subscores II, III, IVa-c. Although a good model fit was observed, primary EQ-5D data are always preferable. Further validation of the prediction algorithm within large, independent studies is necessary prior to its generalised use.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-35en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662160/pdf/en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectParkinson’s diseaseen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectEuroQoL/EQ-5Den_US
dc.subjectUPDRSen_US
dc.subjectPDQ-8en_US
dc.subjectPredictionen_US
dc.titleMapping the EQ-5D index by UPDRS and PDQ-8 in patients with Parkinson’s diseaseen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomesen_US
dash.depositing.authorSiebert, Uwe
dc.date.available2014-02-21T20:31:20Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1477-7525-11-35*
dash.authorsorderedfalse
dash.contributor.affiliatedSiebert, Uwe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record