Performance of Polygenic Scores for Predicting Phobic Anxiety
Glymour, M. Maria
MetadataShow full item record
CitationWalter, Stefan, M. Maria Glymour, Karestan Koenen, Liming Liang, Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen, Marilyn Cornelis, Shun-Chiao Chang, Eric Rimm, Ichiro Kawachi, and Laura D. Kubzansky. 2013. “Performance of Polygenic Scores for Predicting Phobic Anxiety.” PLoS ONE 8 (11): e80326. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080326.
AbstractContext Anxiety disorders are common, with a lifetime prevalence of 20% in the U.S., and are responsible for substantial burdens of disability, missed work days and health care utilization. To date, no causal genetic variants have been identified for anxiety, anxiety disorders, or related traits. Objective: To investigate whether a phobic anxiety symptom score was associated with 3 alternative polygenic risk scores, derived from external genome-wide association studies of anxiety, an internally estimated agnostic polygenic score, or previously identified candidate genes. Design: Longitudinal follow-up study. Using linear and logistic regression we investigated whether phobic anxiety was associated with polygenic risk scores derived from internal, leave-one out genome-wide association studies, from 31 candidate genes, and from out-of-sample genome-wide association weights previously shown to predict depression and anxiety in another cohort. Setting and Participants: Study participants (n = 11,127) were individuals from the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Main Outcome Measure: Anxiety symptoms were assessed via the 8-item phobic anxiety scale of the Crown Crisp Index at two time points, from which a continuous phenotype score was derived. Results: We found no genome-wide significant associations with phobic anxiety. Phobic anxiety was also not associated with a polygenic risk score derived from the genome-wide association study beta weights using liberal p-value thresholds; with a previously published genome-wide polygenic score; or with a candidate gene risk score based on 31 genes previously hypothesized to predict anxiety. Conclusion: There is a substantial gap between twin-study heritability estimates of anxiety disorders ranging between 20–40% and heritability explained by genome-wide association results. New approaches such as improved genome imputations, application of gene expression and biological pathways information, and incorporating social or environmental modifiers of genetic risks may be necessary to identify significant genetic predictors of anxiety.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11879004