Direct Comparison of Adjacent Endocardial and Epicardial Electrograms: Implications for Substrate Mapping

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Direct Comparison of Adjacent Endocardial and Epicardial Electrograms: Implications for Substrate Mapping

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Direct Comparison of Adjacent Endocardial and Epicardial Electrograms: Implications for Substrate Mapping
Author: Tokuda, Michifumi; Tedrow, Usha B.; Inada, Keiichi; Reichlin, Tobias; Michaud, Gregory F.; John, Roy M.; Epstein, Laurence M.; Stevenson, William G.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Tokuda, Michifumi, Usha B. Tedrow, Keiichi Inada, Tobias Reichlin, Gregory F. Michaud, Roy M. John, Laurence M. Epstein, and William G. Stevenson. 2013. “Direct Comparison of Adjacent Endocardial and Epicardial Electrograms: Implications for Substrate Mapping.” Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease 2 (5): e000215. doi:10.1161/JAHA.113.000215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000215.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Analysis of unipolar voltage maps has been used to detect epicardial scar, but data to define optimal parameters to identify scar remote from the recording site is limited. This study compares the characteristics of electrograms at endocardial sites adjacent to abnormal epicardial sites. Methods and Results: Data obtained from endocardial and epicardial electroanatomical maps of 31 patients with scar‐related ventricular tachycardia were reviewed. Five hundred twenty‐three pairs of endo‐ and epicardial points were selected according to predefined criteria. The endocardial points adjacent to epicardial scar (bipolar voltage <1.5 mV) had smaller unipolar voltage than those distant from epicardial scar (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, unipolar voltage was the only endocardial electrogram predictor of epicardial scar (P<0.001, OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.97). An endocardial unipolar amplitude <4.4 mV in the right ventricular (RV) (sensitivity 93%, specificity 76%) and <5.1 mV in the left ventricular (LV) (sensitivity 91%, specificity 75%) was the optimal cutoff predicting epicardial scar. Applying these thresholds to electroanatomical maps, revealed a good match between endocardial unipolar abnormality and epicardial scar for 67% of LV and 75% of RV maps, respectively, but notably poor matches occurred in 8 (29%) maps (7 with nonischemic cardiomyopathy). Site‐by‐site correlations were better for ischemic than nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Conclusions: This study supports the contention that unipolar electrograms are capable of indicating overlying epicardial scar during endocardial mapping, but illustrates limitations that appear to differ with nonischemic as compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy. The presence of epicardial arrhythmia substrate cannot be excluded by analysis of unipolar endocardial maps in some patients.
Published Version: doi:10.1161/JAHA.113.000215
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835221/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11879122
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters