The adolescent transition under energetic stress: Body composition tradeoffs among adolescent women in The Gambia
Moore, Sophie E.
Prentice, Andrew M.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationReiches, Meredith W., Sophie E. Moore, Andrew M. Prentice, Ann Prentice, Yankuba Sawo, and Peter T. Ellison. 2013. “The adolescent transition under energetic stress: Body composition tradeoffs among adolescent women in The Gambia.” Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health 2013 (1): 75-85. doi:10.1093/emph/eot005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emph/eot005.
AbstractBackground and objectives: Life history theory predicts a shift in energy allocation from growth to reproductive function as a consequence of puberty. During adolescence, linear growth tapers off and, in females, ovarian steroid production increases. In this model, acquisition of lean mass is associated with growth while investment in adiposity is associated with reproduction. This study examines the chronological and developmental predictors of energy allocation patterns among adolescent women under conditions of energy constraint. Methodology: Fifty post-menarcheal adolescent women between 14 and 20 years old were sampled for weight and body composition at the beginning and end of 1 month in an energy-adequate season and 1 month in the subsequent energy-constrained season in a rural province of The Gambia. Results: Chronologically and developmentally younger adolescent girls gain weight in the form of lean mass in both energy-adequate and energy-constrained seasons, whereas older adolescents lose lean mass under conditions of energetic stress (generalized estimating equation (GEE) Wald chi-square comparing youngest tertile with older two tertiles 9.750, P = 0.002; GEE Wald chi-square comparing fast- with slow-growing individuals for growth rate 19.806, P < 0.001). When energy is limited, younger adolescents lose and older adolescents maintain fat (GEE Wald chi-square for interaction of age and season 6.568, P = 0.010; GEE Wald chi-square comparing fast- with slow-growing individuals for interaction of growth rate and season 7.807, P = 0.005). Conclusions and implications: When energy is constrained, the physiology of younger adolescents invests in growth while that of older adolescent females privileges reproductively valuable adipose tissue.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11879556
- FAS Scholarly Articles