Improved control of exogenous attention in action video game players

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Improved control of exogenous attention in action video game players

Citable link to this page


Title: Improved control of exogenous attention in action video game players
Author: Cain, Matthew S.; Prinzmetal, William; Shimamura, Arthur P.; Landau, Ayelet N.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Cain, Matthew S., William Prinzmetal, Arthur P. Shimamura, and Ayelet N. Landau. 2014. “Improved control of exogenous attention in action video game players.” Frontiers in Psychology 5 (1): 69. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00069.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Action video game players (VGPs) have demonstrated a number of attentional advantages over non-players. Here, we propose that many of those benefits might be underpinned by improved control over exogenous (i.e., stimulus-driven) attention. To test this we used an anti-cueing task, in which a sudden-onset cue indicated that the target would likely appear in a separate location on the opposite side of the fixation point. When the time between the cue onset and the target onset was short (40 ms), non-players (nVGPs) showed a typical exogenous attention effect. Their response times were faster to targets presented at the cued (but less probable) location compared with the opposite (more probable) location. VGPs, however, were less likely to have their attention drawn to the location of the cue. When the onset asynchrony was long (600 ms), VGPs and nVGPs were equally able to endogenously shift their attention to the likely (opposite) target location. In order to rule out processing-speed differences as an explanation for this result, we also tested VGPs and nVGPs on an attentional blink (AB) task. In a version of the AB task that minimized demands on task switching and iconic memory, VGPs and nVGPs did not differ in second target identification performance (i.e., VGPs had the same magnitude of AB as nVGPs), suggesting that the anti-cueing results were due to flexible control over exogenous attention rather than to more general speed-of-processing differences.
Published Version: doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00069
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search