Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFruchart, Jean-Charlesen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavignon, Jeanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHermans, Michel Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorAl-Rubeaan, Khaliden_US
dc.contributor.authorAmarenco, Pierreen_US
dc.contributor.authorAssmann, Gerden_US
dc.contributor.authorBarter, Philipen_US
dc.contributor.authorBetteridge, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorBruckert, Ericen_US
dc.contributor.authorCuevas, Adaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFarnier, Michelen_US
dc.contributor.authorFerrannini, Eleen_US
dc.contributor.authorFioretto, Paolaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGenest, Jacquesen_US
dc.contributor.authorGinsberg, Henry Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorGotto, Antonio Men_US
dc.contributor.authorHu, Dayien_US
dc.contributor.authorKadowaki, Takashien_US
dc.contributor.authorKodama, Tatsuhikoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrempf, Michelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatsuzawa, Yujien_US
dc.contributor.authorNúñez-Cortés, Jesús Millánen_US
dc.contributor.authorMonfil, Carlos Calvoen_US
dc.contributor.authorOgawa, Hisaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPlutzky, Jorgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorRader, Daniel Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorSadikot, Shaukaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Raul Den_US
dc.contributor.authorShlyakhto, Evgenyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSritara, Piyamitren_US
dc.contributor.authorSy, Rodyen_US
dc.contributor.authorTall, Alanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTan, Chee Engen_US
dc.contributor.authorTokgözoğlu, Laleen_US
dc.contributor.authorToth, Peter Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorValensi, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWanner, Christophen_US
dc.contributor.authorZambon, Albertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Junrenen_US
dc.contributor.authorZimmet, Paulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-11T13:53:33Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationFruchart, J., J. Davignon, M. P. Hermans, K. Al-Rubeaan, P. Amarenco, G. Assmann, P. Barter, et al. 2014. “Residual macrovascular risk in 2013: what have we learned?” Cardiovascular Diabetology 13 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/1475-2840-13-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-13-26.en
dc.identifier.issn1475-2840en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11879855
dc.description.abstractCardiovascular disease poses a major challenge for the 21st century, exacerbated by the pandemics of obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. While best standards of care, including high-dose statins, can ameliorate the risk of vascular complications, patients remain at high risk of cardiovascular events. The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R3i) has previously highlighted atherogenic dyslipidaemia, defined as the imbalance between proatherogenic triglyceride-rich apolipoprotein B-containing-lipoproteins and antiatherogenic apolipoprotein A-I-lipoproteins (as in high-density lipoprotein, HDL), as an important modifiable contributor to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk, especially in insulin-resistant conditions. As part of its mission to improve awareness and clinical management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia, the R3i has identified three key priorities for action: i) to improve recognition of atherogenic dyslipidaemia in patients at high cardiometabolic risk with or without diabetes; ii) to improve implementation and adherence to guideline-based therapies; and iii) to improve therapeutic strategies for managing atherogenic dyslipidaemia. The R3i believes that monitoring of non-HDL cholesterol provides a simple, practical tool for treatment decisions regarding the management of lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk. Addition of a fibrate, niacin (North and South America), omega-3 fatty acids or ezetimibe are all options for combination with a statin to further reduce non-HDL cholesterol, although lacking in hard evidence for cardiovascular outcome benefits. Several emerging treatments may offer promise. These include the next generation peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorα agonists, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors and monoclonal antibody therapy targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. However, long-term outcomes and safety data are clearly needed. In conclusion, the R3i believes that ongoing trials with these novel treatments may help to define the optimal management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce the clinical and socioeconomic burden of residual cardiovascular risk.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1186/1475-2840-13-26en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922777/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectResidual cardiovascular risken
dc.subjectAtherogenic dyslipidaemiaen
dc.subjectType 2 diabetesen
dc.subjectTherapeutic optionsen
dc.titleResidual macrovascular risk in 2013: what have we learned?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalCardiovascular Diabetologyen
dash.depositing.authorPlutzky, Jorgeen_US
dc.date.available2014-03-11T13:53:33Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1475-2840-13-26*
dash.authorsorderedfalse
dash.contributor.affiliatedPlutzky, Jorge


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record