Global Estimates of CO Sources with High Resolution by Adjoint Inversion of Multiple Satellite Datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES)

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Global Estimates of CO Sources with High Resolution by Adjoint Inversion of Multiple Satellite Datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES)

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Global Estimates of CO Sources with High Resolution by Adjoint Inversion of Multiple Satellite Datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES)
Author: Kopacz, M.; Jacob, Daniel J.; Fisher, John; Logan, Jennifer A.; Zhang, L.; Megretskaia, Inna A.; Yantosca, Robert M.; Singh, K.; Henze, D. K.; Burrows, J. P.; Buchwitz, M.; Khlystova, I.; McMillan, W. W.; Gille, J. C.; Edwards, D. P.; Eldering, A.; Thouret, V.; Nedelec, P.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Kopacz, M., Daniel J. Jacob, John Fisher, Jennifer A. Logan, L. Zhang, Inna A. Megretskaia, Robert M. Yantosca, et al. 2010. “Global Estimates of CO Sources with High Resolution by Adjoint Inversion of Multiple Satellite Datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES).” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10 (3) (February 1): 855–876. doi:10.5194/acp-10-855-2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-855-2010.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: We combine CO column measurements from the MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, and TES satellite instruments in a full-year (May 2004–April 2005) global inversion of CO sources at 4°×5° spatial resolution and monthly temporal resolution. The inversion uses the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model (CTM) and its adjoint applied to MOPITT, AIRS, and SCIAMACHY. Observations from TES, surface sites (NOAA/GMD), and aircraft (MOZAIC) are used for evaluation of the a posteriori solution. Using GEOS-Chem as a common intercomparison platform shows global consistency between the different satellite datasets and with the in situ data. Differences can be largely explained by different averaging kernels and a priori information. The global CO emission from combustion as constrained in the inversion is \(1350 Tg a^{−1}\). This is much higher than current bottom-up emission inventories. A large fraction of the correction results from a seasonal underestimate of CO sources at northern mid-latitudes in winter and suggests a larger-than-expected CO source from vehicle cold starts and residential heating. Implementing this seasonal variation of emissions solves the long-standing problem of models underestimating CO in the northern extratropics in winter-spring. A posteriori emissions also indicate a general underestimation of biomass burning in the GFED2 inventory. However, the tropical biomass burning constraints are not quantitatively consistent across the different datasets.
Published Version: doi:10.5194/acp-10-855-2010
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11931829
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters