TMS affects moral judgment, showing the role of DLPFC and TPJ in cognitive and emotional processing
Sack, Alexander T.
Russ, Brian E.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationJeurissen, Danique, Alexander T. Sack, Alard Roebroeck, Brian E. Russ, and Alvaro Pascual-Leone. 2014. “TMS affects moral judgment, showing the role of DLPFC and TPJ in cognitive and emotional processing.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8 (1): 18. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00018.
AbstractDecision-making involves a complex interplay of emotional responses and reasoning processes. In this study, we use TMS to explore the neurobiological substrates of moral decisions in humans. To examining the effects of TMS on the outcome of a moral-decision, we compare the decision outcome of moral-personal and moral-impersonal dilemmas to each other and examine the differential effects of applying TMS over the right DLPFC or right TPJ. In this comparison, we find that the TMS-induced disruption of the DLPFC during the decision process, affects the outcome of the moral-personal judgment, while TMS-induced disruption of TPJ affects only moral-impersonal conditions. In other words, we find a double-dissociation between DLPFC and TPJ in the outcome of a moral decision. Furthermore, we find that TMS-induced disruption of the DLPFC during non-moral, moral-impersonal, and moral-personal decisions lead to lower ratings of regret about the decision. Our results are in line with the dual-process theory and suggest a role for both the emotional response and cognitive reasoning process in moral judgment. Both the emotional and cognitive processes were shown to be involved in the decision outcome.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12064520
- HMS Scholarly Articles