A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for success

DSpace/Manakin Repository

A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for success

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for success
Author: Wright, Adam; Ash, Joan S; Erickson, Jessica L; Wasserman, Joe; Bunce, Arwen; Stanescu, Ana; St Hilaire, Daniel; Panzenhagen, Morgan; Gebhardt, Eric; McMullen, Carmit; Middleton, Blackford; Sittig, Dean F

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Wright, A., J. S. Ash, J. L. Erickson, J. Wasserman, A. Bunce, A. Stanescu, D. St Hilaire, et al. 2014. “A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for success.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 21 (3): 464-472. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objective: To describe the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support (CDS) at leading sites. Materials and methods We conducted ethnographic observations at seven diverse sites with a history of excellence in CDS using the Rapid Assessment Process and analyzed the data using a series of card sorts, informed by Linstone's Multiple Perspectives Model. Results: We identified 18 activities and grouped them into four areas. Area 1: Fostering relationships across the organization, with activities (a) training and support, (b) visibility/presence on the floor, (c) liaising between people, (d) administration and leadership, (e) project management, (f) cheerleading/buy-in/sponsorship, (g) preparing for CDS implementation. Area 2: Assembling the system with activities (a) providing technical support, (b) CDS content development, (c) purchasing products from vendors (d) knowledge management, (e) system integration. Area 3: Using CDS to achieve the organization's goals with activities (a) reporting, (b) requirements-gathering/specifications, (c) monitoring CDS, (d) linking CDS to goals, (e) managing data. Area 4: Participation in external policy and standards activities (this area consists of only a single activity). We also identified a set of recommendations associated with these 18 activities. Discussion All 18 activities we identified were performed at all sites, although the way they were organized into roles differed substantially. We consider these activities critical to the success of a CDS program. Conclusions: A series of activities are performed by sites strong in CDS, and sites adopting CDS should ensure they incorporate these activities into their efforts.
Published Version: doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001771
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3994853/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12152984
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters