Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNassiri, Naderen_US
dc.contributor.authorSheibani, Kouroshen_US
dc.contributor.authorSafi, Sareen_US
dc.contributor.authorNassiri, Samanen_US
dc.contributor.authorZiaee, Alirezaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaji, Farnazen_US
dc.contributor.authorMehravaran, Shivaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNassiri, Narimanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-07T17:03:57Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationNassiri, Nader, Kourosh Sheibani, Sare Safi, Saman Nassiri, Alireza Ziaee, Farnaz Haji, Shiva Mehravaran, and Nariman Nassiri. 2014. “Central Corneal Thickness in Highly Myopic Eyes: Inter-device Agreement of Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Pentacam and Orbscan II Before and After Photorefractive Keratectomy.” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research 9 (1): 14-21.en
dc.identifier.issn2008-2010en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12406757
dc.description.abstractPurpose To determine inter-device agreement for central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement among ultrasound pachymetry, rotating Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), and scanning slit corneal topography (Orbscan II, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) in highly myopic eyes before and after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: This prospective comparative study included 61 eyes of 32 patients with high myopia who underwent PRK. Six month postoperative CCT values were compared to preoperative values in 27 patients (51 eyes) who completed the follow up period. To determine the level of agreement, Pentacam and Orbscan II readings were compared to ultrasonic pachymetry measurements as the gold standard method. Results: Mean CCT measurements with ultrasound, Pentacam, and Orbscan II before PRK were 557µm, 556µm, and 564µm, respectively; and 451µm, 447µm, and 438µm 6 months after surgery in the same order. Preoperatively, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) with ultrasound measurements were -20μm to 17μm for Pentacam and -21μm to 33μm for Orbscan II. Six months postoperatively, the 95% LoA were -30μm to 23μm for Pentacam and -69μm to 43μm for Orbscan II. Conclusion: Preoperatively, CCT measurements were higher with Orbscan II as compared to ultrasound. Postoperatively, both Pentacam and Orbscan II measurements were lower than those obtained with ultrasound, but Pentacam had better agreement. The use of ultrasound, as the gold standard method, or Pentacam both appear to be preferable over Orbscan II among patients with high myopia.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherOphthalmic Research Centeren
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074469/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectMyopiaen
dc.subjectCentral Corneal Thicknessen
dc.subjectPhotorefractive Keratectomyen
dc.subjectUltrasound Pachymetry Pentacamen
dc.subjectOrbscan IIen
dc.titleCentral Corneal Thickness in Highly Myopic Eyes: Inter-device Agreement of Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Pentacam and Orbscan II Before and After Photorefractive Keratectomyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalJournal of Ophthalmic & Vision Researchen
dc.date.available2014-07-07T17:03:57Z
dash.authorsorderedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record