Policies to increase the social value of science and the scientist satisfaction. An exploratory survey among Harvard bioscientists.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationBallabeni, Andrea, Andrea Boggio, and David Hemenway. 2014. “Policies to increase the social value of science and the scientist satisfaction. An exploratory survey among Harvard bioscientists.” F1000Research 3 (1): 20. doi:10.12688/f1000research.3-20.v1. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3-20.v1.
AbstractBasic research in the biomedical field generates both knowledge that has a value per se regardless of its possible practical outcome and that has the potential to produce more practical benefits. Policies can increase the benefit potential to society of basic biomedical research by offering various kinds of incentives to basic researchers. In this paper we argue that soft incentives or “nudges” are particularly promising. However, to be well designed, these incentives must take into account the motivations, goals and views of the basic scientists. In the paper we present the results of an investigation that involved more than 300 scientists at Harvard Medical School and affiliated institutes. The study shows that basic researchers’ support for soft incentives is such that the transformative value of fundamental investigations can be increased without affecting the spirit of the basic research and scientists’ work satisfaction. After discussing the findings, we suggest a few examples of nudges and discuss one in more detail.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12406889
- SPH Scholarly Articles