Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorForsyth, Ann
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-24T20:08:02Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationForsyth, Ann. 2012. Commentary: Alternative Cultures in Planning Research--From Extending Scientific Frontiers to Exploring Enduring Questions. Journal of Planning Education and Research 32, no. 2: 160–168.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0739-456Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1552-6577en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12748041
dc.description.abstractAs the planning academy has grown and evolved, it has developed different ways of doing planning research. People may (a) work at the scientific frontier, (b) investigate issues of practical relevance, (c) reflect on the implications of practice, or (d) try to answer the enduring questions of planning. These are important differences. Different cultures represent varying ideas about what constitutes an important or significant contribution to the field of planning.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1177/0739456x12442217en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectplanning educationen_US
dc.subjectresearch methodsen_US
dc.subjectresearch cultureen_US
dc.titleCommentary: Alternative Cultures in Planning Research--From Extending Scientific Frontiers to Exploring Enduring Questionsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Planning Education and Researchen_US
dash.depositing.authorForsyth, Ann
dc.date.available2014-08-24T20:08:02Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0739456x12442217*
dash.contributor.affiliatedForsyth, Ann


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record