“Only Procedural”: Thoughts on the Substantive Law Dimensions of Preliminary Procedural Decisions in Employment Discrimination Cases

DSpace/Manakin Repository

“Only Procedural”: Thoughts on the Substantive Law Dimensions of Preliminary Procedural Decisions in Employment Discrimination Cases

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: “Only Procedural”: Thoughts on the Substantive Law Dimensions of Preliminary Procedural Decisions in Employment Discrimination Cases
Author: Gertner, Nancy; Schneider, Elizabeth

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Elizabeth M. Schneider & Hon. Nancy Gertner, “Only Procedural”: Thoughts on the Substantive Law Dimensions of Preliminary Procedural Decisions in Employment Discrimination Cases, 57 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 767 (2013).
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: This brief essay was written for a symposium volume, Trial by Jury or Trial by Motion? Summary Judgment, Iqbal, and Employment Discrimination, based on presentations at a conference at New York Law School in April 2012. It addresses the Supreme Court’s invitation in several different contexts for trial courts to evaluate the merits of the case on the basis of limited, even skewed, information. Piqued by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wal-Mart, we consider these issues from our different vantage points as academic and former federal judge, both involved for many years in civil rights and employment discrimination litigation in different settings. We share a concern about how substantive law on discrimination can be shaped, misinterpreted, and misread in many of these “only procedural” rulings.

The essay begins with a brief discussion of Wal-Mart to illustrate how preliminary procedural decisions have implications for substantive law. We then examine how Twombly and Iqbal have affected the substantive law dimensions of Rule 12(b)(6) decisions in general, then consider the special problems that Iqbal and Twombly pose in employment discrimination cases in particular. We conclude with some general lessons to be drawn from seeing “substance” in preliminary procedural decisions, the implications of this inquiry for federal civil litigation, and raise questions for further exploration.
Published Version: http://www.nylslawreview.com/201213-volume-57-number-4/
Other Sources: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2310626
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12876736
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters