Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLevitsky, Steven R.
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Catherine Lena
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-21T12:48:05Z
dash.embargo.terms2018-12-10en_US
dc.date.issued2014-10-21
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.identifier.citationKelly, Catherine Lena. 2014. Why (So many) Parties? The Logic of Party Formation in Senegal. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/gsas.harvard.inactive:11721en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13064816
dc.description.abstractPolitical parties proliferated in Senegal and other competitive authoritarian regimes in post-Cold War Africa. This dissertation examines the causes and consequences of that proliferation. Why do so many politicians create their own parties in this context and what are the consequences of party proliferation for opposition party behavior and presidential turnover? The dissertation addresses these questions with original data collected over sixteen months of fieldwork in Senegal, including over one hundred interviews, material from party archives, local press clippings, political biographies, and data on elections and party behavior. Party formation, strategy, and competition are shaped by the "uneven playing field," a hallmark of competitive authoritarian regimes that entails systematic, deep advantages for the ruling party in terms of access to political finance, media, and the state. Focused on Senegal, a critical case of party proliferation, the dissertation traces how the uneven playing field not only empowers the president to create incentives for proliferation; it also renders life in the opposition so difficult that many politicians form parties to negotiate their way into the state. A significant subset of Senegalese party leaders is primarily concerned not with competing in elections; they focus instead on patronage negotiation, which does not necessarily entail vote-seeking. Moreover, because most party leaders minimize their involvement in elections that are difficult to win, they rarely function as the consistent opposition parties that bolster liberal democracy. Party leaders rarely possess the endowments that foster such behavior- namely, prior experience as high-level state administrators and access to international private financing. Finally, in the absence of consistent opposition parties, ex-regime insiders often constitute the president's most serious electoral challengers. Insider opposition candidates' previous access to the state provides opportunities for political advancement that outsiders lack.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernmenten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.subjectcompetitive authoritarianismen_US
dc.subjectdemocratizationen_US
dc.subjectparty-buildingen_US
dc.subjectpolitical partiesen_US
dc.subjectSenegalen_US
dc.titleWhy (So many) Parties? The Logic of Party Formation in Senegalen_US
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_US
dash.depositing.authorKelly, Catherine Lena
thesis.degree.date2014en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGovernmenten_US
thesis.degree.grantorHarvard Universityen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDominguez, Jorgeen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberIchino, Nahomien_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberVillalon, Leonardoen_US
dash.workflow.commentsAuthor requested embargo be lifted on 12/11/2018
dash.contributor.affiliatedKelly, Catherine Lena


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record