Acid Suppression Therapy Does Not Predispose to Clostridium difficile Infection: The Case of the Potential Bias

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Acid Suppression Therapy Does Not Predispose to Clostridium difficile Infection: The Case of the Potential Bias

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Acid Suppression Therapy Does Not Predispose to Clostridium difficile Infection: The Case of the Potential Bias
Author: Novack, Lena; Kogan, Slava; Gimpelevich, Larisa; Howell, Michael; Borer, Abraham; Kelly, Ciarán P.; Leffler, Daniel A.; Novack, Victor

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Novack, Lena, Slava Kogan, Larisa Gimpelevich, Michael Howell, Abraham Borer, Ciarán P. Kelly, Daniel A. Leffler, and Victor Novack. 2014. “Acid Suppression Therapy Does Not Predispose to Clostridium difficile Infection: The Case of the Potential Bias.” PLoS ONE 9 (10): e110790. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110790.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objective: An adverse effect of acid-suppression medications on the occurrence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been a common finding of many, but not all studies. We hypothesized that association between acid-suppression medications and CDI is due to the residual confounding in comparison between patients with infection to those without, predominantly from non-tested and less sick subjects. We aimed to evaluate the effect of acid suppression therapy on incidence of CDI by comparing patients with CDI to two control groups: not tested patients and patients suspected of having CDI, but with a negative test. Methods: We conducted a case-control study of adult patients hospitalized in internal medicine department of tertiary teaching hospital between 2005–2010 for at least three days. Controls from each of two groups (negative for CDI and non-tested) were individually matched (1∶1) to cases by primary diagnosis, Charlson comorbidity index, year of hospitalization and gender. Primary outcomes were diagnoses of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9)–coded CDI occurring 72 hours or more after admission. Results: Patients with CDI were similar to controls with a negative test, while controls without CDI testing had lower clinical severity. In multivariable analysis, treatment by acid suppression medications was associated with CDI compared to those who were not tested (OR = 1.88, p-value = 0.032). Conversely, use of acid suppression medications in those who tested negative for the infection was not associated with CDI risk as compared to the cases (OR = 0.66; p = 0.059). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the reported epidemiologic associations between use of acid suppression medications and CDI risk may be spurious. The control group choice has an important impact on the results. Clinical differences between the patients with CDI and those not tested and not suspected of having the infection may explain the different conclusions regarding the acid suppression effect on CDI risk.
Published Version: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110790
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4208782/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13347597
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters