Multi-scale symbolic entropy analysis provides prognostic prediction in patients receiving extracorporeal life support

View/ Open
Author
Lin, Yen-Hung
Huang, Hui-Chun
Chang, Yi-Chung
Lin, Chen
Lo, Men-Tzung
Liu, Li-Yu Daisy
Tsai, Pi-Ru
Chen, Yih-Sharng
Ko, Wen-Je
Ho, Yi-Lwun
Chen, Ming-Fong
Buchman, Timothy G
Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0548-3Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Lin, Y., H. Huang, Y. Chang, C. Lin, M. Lo, L. D. Liu, P. Tsai, et al. 2014. “Multi-scale symbolic entropy analysis provides prognostic prediction in patients receiving extracorporeal life support.” Critical Care 18 (5): 548. doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0548-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0548-3.Abstract
Introduction: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can temporarily support cardiopulmonary function, and is occasionally used in resuscitation. Multi-scale entropy (MSE) derived from heart rate variability (HRV) is a powerful tool in outcome prediction of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Multi-scale symbolic entropy analysis (MSsE), a new method derived from MSE, mitigates the effect of arrhythmia on analysis. The objective is to evaluate the prognostic value of MSsE in patients receiving ECLS. The primary outcome is death or urgent transplantation during the index admission. Methods: Fifty-seven patients receiving ECLS less than 24 hours and 23 control subjects were enrolled. Digital 24-hour Holter electrocardiograms were recorded and three MSsE parameters (slope 5, Area 6–20, Area 6–40) associated with the multiscale correlation and complexity of heart beat fluctuation were calculated. Results: Patients receiving ECLS had significantly lower value of slope 5, area 6 to 20, and area 6 to 40 than control subjects. During the follow-up period, 29 patients met primary outcome. Age, slope 5, Area 6 to 20, Area 6 to 40, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), logistic organ dysfunction score (LODS), and myocardial infarction history were significantly associated with primary outcome. Slope 5 showed the greatest discriminatory power. In a net reclassification improvement model, slope 5 significantly improved the predictive power of LODS; Area 6 to 20 and Area 6 to 40 significantly improved the predictive power in MODS. In an integrated discrimination improvement model, slope 5 added significantly to the prediction power of each clinical parameter. Area 6 to 20 and Area 6 to 40 significantly improved the predictive power in sequential organ failure assessment. Conclusions: MSsE provides additional prognostic information in patients receiving ECLS. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0548-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.Other Sources
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221713/pdf/Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13454712
Collections
- HMS Scholarly Articles [17878]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)