Design of a randomised acupuncture trial on functional neck/shoulder stiffness with two placebo controls

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Design of a randomised acupuncture trial on functional neck/shoulder stiffness with two placebo controls

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Design of a randomised acupuncture trial on functional neck/shoulder stiffness with two placebo controls
Author: Takakura, Nobuari; Takayama, Miho; Kawase, Akiko; Kaptchuk, Ted J; Kong, Jian; Yajima, Hiroyoshi

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Takakura, Nobuari, Miho Takayama, Akiko Kawase, Ted J Kaptchuk, Jian Kong, and Hiroyoshi Yajima. 2014. “Design of a randomised acupuncture trial on functional neck/shoulder stiffness with two placebo controls.” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 14 (1): 246. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-246.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Functional neck/shoulder stiffness is one of the most well-known indications for acupuncture treatment in Japan. There is little evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment for functional neck/shoulder stiffness. Research using two different placebos may allow an efficient method to tease apart the components of real acupuncture from various kinds of ‘non-specific’ effects such as ritual with touch or ritual alone. Herein, we describe a protocol of an ongoing, single-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial which aims to assess whether, in functional neck/shoulder stiffness, acupuncture treatment with skin piercing has a specific effect over two types of placebo: skin-touching plus ritual or ritual alone. Methods: Six acupuncturists and 400 patients with functional neck/shoulder stiffness are randomly assigned to four treatment groups: genuine acupuncture penetrating the skin, skin-touch placebo or no-touch placebo needles in a double-blind manner (practitioner-patient blinding) or no-treatment control group. Each acupuncturist applies a needle to each of four acupoints (Bladder10, Small Intestine14, Gallbladder21 and Bladder42) in the neck/shoulder to 50 patients. Before, immediately after and 24 hours after the treatment, patients are asked about the intensity of their neck/shoulder stiffness. After the treatment, practitioners and patients are asked to guess whether the treatment is “penetrating”, “skin-touch” or “no-touch” or to record “cannot identify the treatment”. Discussion In addition to intention-to-treat analysis, we will conduct subgroup analysis based on practitioners’ or patients’ guesses to discuss the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments with skin piercing and various placebo controls. The results of practitioner and patient blinding will be discussed. We believe this study will further distinguish the role of different components of acupuncture. Trial registration Current Controlled Trial ISRCTN76896018
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-246
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223566/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13454722
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters