Self-Defeating Proposals: Ackerman on Emergency Powers
Self-Defeating Proposals.pdf (1.267Mb)
Access StatusFull text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("dark deposit"). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationAdrian Vermeule, Self-Defeating Proposals: Ackerman on Emergency Powers, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 631 (2006).
AbstractThis paper responds to Bruce Ackerman's recent book on emergency powers (After the Next Attack: Emergency Powers in an Age of Terrorism). Ackerman stumbles into a methodological pitfall by offering a self-defeating proposal: the diagnosis that Ackerman offers itself rules out the prescription that he suggests. Proposals defeat themselves when the motives, beliefs or political opportunities ascribed to relevant actors by the theorist's diagnosis are incompatible with the solution that the theorist offers. The value of the book, then, is that it provides a methodological cautionary tale.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13614533
- HLS Scholarly Articles