From Liberty to Equality: The Transformation of the Establishment Clause

DSpace/Manakin Repository

From Liberty to Equality: The Transformation of the Establishment Clause

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: From Liberty to Equality: The Transformation of the Establishment Clause
Author: Feldman, Noah R.
Citation: Noah Feldman, From Liberty to Equality: The Transformation of the Establishment Clause, 90 Calif. L. Rev. 673 (2002).
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: In this Article, Professor Feldman argues that in the last fifty years, the Supreme Court has transformed the rationale of the Establishment Clause from protecting the liberty of conscience of religious dissenters to guaranteeing the political equality of religious minorities. When it invented the modern Establishment Clause in 1947, the Court anachronistically emphasized avoidance of religious violence, but correctly identified protection of religious liberty as the central goal of the Clause. Since then, the Court gradually developed a new justification for the separation of church and state: entanglement would cause religious minorities to feel like political outsiders, and thus create political inequality. Having traced the transformation from a liberty rationale to an equality rationale through the cases, Professor Feldman evaluates the consequences by reexamining the central modern Establishment Clause question: what is so special about religion? He argues that none of the possible answers suffices to explain why the Establishment Clause should be read to protect religious minorities' political equality. Religious minorities are not uniquely vulnerable to political inequality compared to racial, linguistic, or political minorities. The Article concludes by arguing that the political-equality approach to the Clause has distorted Establishment Clause jurisprudence. In the sphere of public manifestations of religion, it has produced tenuous distinctions between impermissible state action and permissible collective private action. In the sphere of government support of religious institutions, the political-equality approach, which set out to explain why the Constitution requires separation of church and state, could eliminate separation altogether by permitting government funding of religious institutions via formally equal, general allocations of funds.
Published Version: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481234
Other Sources: http://ssrn.com/abstract=316101
http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol90/iss3/1/
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13773874
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters