Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSunstein, Cass Robert
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-28T19:21:26Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-28
dc.identifier.citationCass R. Sunstein, Hazardous Heuristics (Pub. L. & Legal Theory Working Papers No. 33, 2002).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13839267
dc.description.abstractNew work on heuristics and biases has explored the role of emotions and affect; the idea of “dual processing”; the place of heuristics and biases outside of the laboratory; and the implications of heuristics and biases for policy and law. This review-essay focuses on certain aspects of Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, edited by Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman. An understanding of heuristics and biases casts light on many issues in law, involving jury awards, risk regulation, and political economy in general. Some attention is given to the possibility of “moral heuristics”—rules of thumb, for purposes of morality, that generally work well but that also systematically misfire.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/public_law_and_legal_theory/138/en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=344620en_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleHazardous Heuristicsen_US
dc.typeResearch Paper or Reporten_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dash.depositing.authorSunstein, Cass Robert
dash.embargo.until10000-01-01
dash.contributor.affiliatedSunstein, Cass


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record