Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide
Heald, Colette L.
Jones, Dylan B. A.
Palmer, Paul I.
Streets, D. G.
Sachse, Glen W.
Gille, John C.
Hoffman, Ross N.
MetadataShow full item record
CitationHeald, Colette L., Daniel J. Jacob, Dylan B. A. Jones, Paul I. Palmer, Jennifer A. Logan, D. G. Streets, Glen W. Sachse, John C. Gille, Ross N. Hoffman, and Thomas Nehrkorn. 2004. “Comparative Inverse Analysis of Satellite (MOPITT) and Aircraft (TRACE-P) Observations to Estimate Asian Sources of Carbon Monoxide.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 109 (D23) (December 11). doi:10.1029/2004jd005185.
AbstractWe use an inverse model analysis to compare the top-down constraints on Asian sources of carbon monoxide (CO) in spring 2001 from (1) daily MOPITT satellite observations of CO columns over Asia and the neighboring oceans and (2) aircraft observations of CO concentrations in Asian outflow from the TRACE-P aircraft mission over the northwest Pacific. The inversion uses the maximum a posteriori method (MAP) and the GEOS-CHEM chemical transport model (CTM) as the forward model. Detailed error characterization is presented, including spatial correlation of the model transport error. Nighttime MOPITT observations appear to be biased and are excluded from the inverse analysis. We find that MOPITT and TRACE-P observations are independently consistent in the constraints that they provide on Asian CO sources, with the exception of southeast Asia for which the MOPITT observations support a more modest decrease in emissions than suggested by the aircraft observations. Our analysis indicates that the observations do not allow us to differentiate source types (i.e., anthropogenic versus biomass burning) within a region. MOPITT provides ten pieces of information to constrain the geographical distribution of CO sources, while TRACE-P provides only four. The greater information from MOPITT reflects its ability to observe all outflow and source regions. We conducted a number of sensitivity studies for the inverse model analysis using the MOPITT data. Temporal averaging of the MOPITT data (weekly and beyond) degrades the ability to constrain regional sources. Merging source regions beyond what is appropriate after careful selection of the state vector leads to significant aggregation errors. Calculations for an ensemble of realistic assumptions lead to a range of inverse model solutions that has greater uncertainty than the a posteriori errors for the MAP solution. Our best estimate of total Asian CO sources is 361 Tg yr−1, over half of which is attributed to east Asia.
Citable link to this pagehttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:14061856
- FAS Scholarly Articles 
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)