Fractionation of multiple sulfur isotopes during phototrophic oxidation of sulfide and elemental sulfur by a green sulfur bacterium

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Fractionation of multiple sulfur isotopes during phototrophic oxidation of sulfide and elemental sulfur by a green sulfur bacterium

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Fractionation of multiple sulfur isotopes during phototrophic oxidation of sulfide and elemental sulfur by a green sulfur bacterium
Author: Zerkle, Aubrey L.; Farquhar, James; Johnston, David T; Cox, Raymond P.; Canfield, Donald E.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Zerkle, Aubrey L., James Farquhar, David T. Johnston, Raymond P. Cox, and Donald E. Canfield. 2009. “Fractionation of Multiple Sulfur Isotopes During Phototrophic Oxidation of Sulfide and Elemental Sulfur by a Green Sulfur Bacterium.” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 73 (2) (January): 291–306. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2008.10.027.
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: We present multiple sulfur isotope measurements of sulfur compounds associated with the oxidation of H2S and S0 by the anoxygenic phototrophic S-oxidizing bacterium Chlorobium tepidum . Discrimination between 34S and 32S was +1.8 ± 0.5‰ during the oxidation of H2S to S0, and −1.9 ± 0.8‰ during the oxidation of S0 to View the MathML sourceSO42-, consistent with previous studies. The accompanying Δ33S and Δ36S values of sulfide, elemental sulfur, and sulfate formed during these experiments were very small, less than 0.1‰ for Δ33S and 0.9‰ for Δ36S, supporting mass conservation principles. Examination of these isotope effects within a framework of the metabolic pathways for S oxidation suggests that the observed effects are due to the flow of sulfur through the metabolisms, rather than abiotic equilibrium isotope exchange alone, as previously suggested. The metabolic network comparison also indicates that these metabolisms work to express some isotope effects (between sulfide, polysulfides, and elemental sulfur in the periplasm) and suppress others (kinetic isotope effects related to pathways for oxidation of sulfide to sulfate via the same enzymes involved in sulfate reduction acting in reverse). Additionally, utilizing fractionation factors for phototrophic S oxidation calculated from our experiments and for other oxidation processes calculated from the literature (chemotrophic and inorganic S oxidation), we constructed a set of ecosystem-scale sulfur isotope box models to examine the isotopic consequences of including sulfide oxidation pathways in a model system. These models demonstrate how the small δ34S effects associated with S oxidation combined with large δ34S effects associated with sulfate reduction (by SRP) and sulfur disproportionation (by SDP) can produce large (and measurable) effects in the Δ33S of sulfur reservoirs. Specifically, redistribution of material along the pathways for sulfide oxidation diminishes the net isotope effect of SRP and SDP, and can mask the isotopic signal for sulfur disproportionation if significant recycling of S intermediates occurs. We show that the different sulfide oxidation processes produce different isotopic fields for identical proportions of oxidation, and discuss the ecological implications of these results to interpreting minor S isotope patterns in modern systems and in the geologic record.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.gca.2008.10.027
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:14081504
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters