Selective and Genetic Constraints on Pneumococcal Serotype Switching
View/ Open
Author
Parkhill, Julian
Bentley, Stephen D.
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005095Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Croucher, Nicholas J., Lisa Kagedan, Claudette M. Thompson, Julian Parkhill, Stephen D. Bentley, Jonathan A. Finkelstein, Marc Lipsitch, and William P. Hanage. 2015. “Selective and Genetic Constraints on Pneumococcal Serotype Switching.” PLoS Genetics 11 (3): e1005095. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005095.Abstract
Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates typically express one of over 90 immunologically distinguishable polysaccharide capsules (serotypes), which can be classified into “serogroups” based on cross-reactivity with certain antibodies. Pneumococci can alter their serotype through recombinations affecting the capsule polysaccharide synthesis (cps) locus. Twenty such “serotype switching” events were fully characterised using a collection of 616 whole genome sequences from systematic surveys of pneumococcal carriage. Eleven of these were within-serogroup switches, representing a highly significant (p < 0.0001) enrichment based on the observed serotype distribution. Whereas the recombinations resulting in between-serogroup switches all spanned the entire cps locus, some of those that caused within-serogroup switches did not. However, higher rates of within-serogroup switching could not be fully explained by either more frequent, shorter recombinations, nor by genetic linkage to genes involved in β–lactam resistance. This suggested the observed pattern was a consequence of selection for preserving serogroup. Phenotyping of strains constructed to express different serotypes in common genetic backgrounds was used to test whether genotypes were physiologically adapted to particular serogroups. These data were consistent with epistatic interactions between the cps locus and the rest of the genome that were specific to serotype, but not serogroup, meaning they were unlikely to account for the observed distribution of capsule types. Exclusion of these genetic and physiological hypotheses suggested future work should focus on alternative mechanisms, such as host immunity spanning multiple serotypes within the same serogroup, which might explain the observed pattern.Other Sources
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4380333/pdf/Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:15034819
Collections
- HMS Scholarly Articles [17922]
- SPH Scholarly Articles [6362]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)