Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSugiyama, Takehiroen_US
dc.contributor.authorHasegawa, Koheien_US
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, Yasukien_US
dc.contributor.authorTakahashi, Osamuen_US
dc.contributor.authorFukui, Tsuguyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsugawa, Yusukeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T15:27:51Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationSugiyama, Takehiro, Kohei Hasegawa, Yasuki Kobayashi, Osamu Takahashi, Tsuguya Fukui, and Yusuke Tsugawa. 2015. “Differential Time Trends of Outcomes and Costs of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalizations by ST Elevation and Type of Intervention in the United States, 2001–2011.” Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease 4 (3): e001445. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001445.en
dc.identifier.issn2047-9980en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:15035008
dc.description.abstractBackground: Little is known whether time trends of in‐hospital mortality and costs of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) differ by type of AMI (ST‐elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] vs. non‐ST‐elevation [NSTEMI]) and by the intervention received (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], or no intervention) in the United States. Methods and Results: We conducted a serial cross‐sectional study of all hospitalizations for AMI aged 30 years or older using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2001–2011 (1 456 154 discharges; a weighted estimate of 7 135 592 discharges). Hospitalizations were stratified by type of AMI and intervention, and the time trends of in‐hospital mortality and hospital costs were examined for each combination of the AMI type and intervention, after adjusting for both patient‐ and hospital‐level characteristics. Compared with 2001, adjusted in‐hospital mortality improved significantly for NSTEMI patients in 2011, regardless of the intervention received (PCI odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.83; CABG OR 0.57, 0.45 to 0.72; without intervention OR 0.61, 0.57 to 0.65). As for STEMI, a decline in adjusted in‐hospital mortality was significant for those who underwent PCI (OR 0.83; 0.73 to 0.94); however, no significant improvement was observed for those who received CABG or without intervention. Hospital costs per hospitalization increased significantly for patients who underwent intervention, but not for those without intervention. Conclusions: In the United States, the decrease in in‐hospital mortality and the increase in costs differed by the AMI type and the intervention received. These non‐uniform trends may be informative for designing effective health policies to reduce the health and economic burdens of AMI.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001445en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392430/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectHealth Services and Outcomes Researchen
dc.subjectacute myocardial infarctionen
dc.subjecthospital costsen
dc.subjectin‐hospital mortalityen
dc.subjecttime trenden
dc.titleDifferential Time Trends of Outcomes and Costs of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalizations by ST Elevation and Type of Intervention in the United States, 2001–2011en
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseaseen
dash.depositing.authorHasegawa, Koheien_US
dc.date.available2015-05-04T15:27:51Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/JAHA.114.001445*
dash.contributor.affiliatedHasegawa, Kohei


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record