Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBambury, Richard Men_US
dc.contributor.authorBhatt, Ami Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorRiester, Markusen_US
dc.contributor.authorPedamallu, Chandra Sekharen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuke, Fujikoen_US
dc.contributor.authorBellmunt, Joaquimen_US
dc.contributor.authorStack, Edward Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Lillianen_US
dc.contributor.authorPark, Rachelen_US
dc.contributor.authorIyer, Gopaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLoda, Massimoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKantoff, Philip Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichor, Franziskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeyerson, Matthewen_US
dc.contributor.authorRosenberg, Jonathan Een_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T15:27:55Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationBambury, R. M., A. S. Bhatt, M. Riester, C. S. Pedamallu, F. Duke, J. Bellmunt, E. C. Stack, et al. 2015. “DNA copy number analysis of metastatic urothelial carcinoma with comparison to primary tumors.” BMC Cancer 15 (1): 242. doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1192-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1192-2.en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:15035024
dc.description.abstractBackground: To date, there have been no reports characterizing the genome-wide somatic DNA chromosomal copy-number alteration landscape in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We sought to characterize the DNA copy-number profile in a cohort of metastatic samples and compare them to a cohort of primary urothelial carcinoma samples in order to identify changes that are associated with progression from primary to metastatic disease. Methods: Using molecular inversion probe array analysis we compared genome-wide chromosomal copy-number alterations between 30 metastatic and 29 primary UC samples. Whole transcriptome RNA-Seq analysis was also performed in primary and matched metastatic samples which was available for 9 patients. Results: Based on a focused analysis of 32 genes in which alterations may be clinically actionable, there were significantly more amplifications/deletions in metastases (8.6% vs 4.5%, p < 0.001). In particular, there was a higher frequency of E2F3 amplification in metastases (30% vs 7%, p = 0.046). Paired primary and metastatic tissue was available for 11 patients and 3 of these had amplifications of potential clinical relevance in metastases that were not in the primary tumor including ERBB2, CDK4, CCND1, E2F3, and AKT1. The transcriptional activity of these amplifications was supported by RNA expression data. Conclusions: The discordance in alterations between primary and metastatic tissue may be of clinical relevance in the era of genomically directed precision cancer medicine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1192-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1186/s12885-015-1192-2en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392457/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.titleDNA copy number analysis of metastatic urothelial carcinoma with comparison to primary tumorsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalBMC Canceren
dash.depositing.authorBellmunt, Joaquimen_US
dc.date.available2015-05-04T15:27:55Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-015-1192-2*
dash.authorsorderedfalse
dash.contributor.affiliatedKantoff, Philip
dash.contributor.affiliatedBellmunt, Joaquim
dash.contributor.affiliatedMeyerson, Matthew
dash.contributor.affiliatedLoda, Massimo


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record